UPDV Updated Bible Version

Ask About This or Go to a Verse

Why the UPDV Uses Sexual Language

When a pastor reads Flee fornication to a congregation, nobody flinches. The word means nothing to a modern ear. When the same pastor reads Stop being a whore, the room goes silent. Both are translations of the same Greek phrase: φεύγετε τὴν πορνείαν (1 Corinthians 6:18). The difference is that one translation failed and the other succeeded.

The UPDV did not add grit to the Bible. It stopped hiding the grit the Holy Spirit inspired.

🔗This Language Belonged in the Temple

The most common objection is that this language 'doesn't belong in church.' The answer: this language belonged in the Temple.

Ezekiel read chapter 16 aloud — every word of it — to the people of Israel. Hosea married a woman of whoring and told the nation 'this is what you look like to God.' Jeremiah asked Jerusalem, 'Where haven't you been plowed?' (3:2). These texts were composed for public reading in sacred space. The prophets used words that made their audience flinch, because comfortable words were not working.

Paul told the Corinthians to 'stop being a whore' (1 Corinthians 6:18), using πορνεία (porneia), a word his audience understood viscerally because they lived in a port city famous for it.4 He did not say 'please refrain from fornication.' He hit them with a word they could feel.

If we sanitize these texts, we are not protecting the congregation. We are overriding the author's intent. The biblical authors chose uncomfortable words because their audiences needed to be uncomfortable. A translation that removes that discomfort has not improved the text, it has neutered it.

🔗The KJV Had It Right

The King James Version translated זָנָה (zanah) as 'whore' and 'whoring' extensively.1 The KJV translators rendered Ezekiel 16:35 as 'O harlot, hear the word of the LORD' and Hosea 4:12 as 'the spirit of whoredoms hath caused them to err.' In 1611, 'whore' was standard English — not slang, not shocking.

Today, 'whore' is highly pejorative. That is not a reason to avoid it — it is the reason to use it. English versions have long divided this word family among several terms. The KJV uses whore, whoredom, and whoring alongside harlot and fornication. The Revised Version (1885) and American Standard Version (1901) retained some whor- forms while using harlot elsewhere.5 Later versions variously use whoredom, harlotry, prostitution, fornication, and sexual immorality. The UPDV deliberately regularizes the family as whore / whoring to retain the prophetic contempt.8

The Hebrew prophets did not write in clinical, sanitized prose. When Ezekiel, Jeremiah, or Hosea used the word זוֹנָה (zonah), they were not filing a polite sociological report, they were delivering a visceral, shocking indictment. To achieve the actual impact of the Hebrew text today, we cannot use polite language. We must use words that modern society finds abrasive, because the original authors intended to abrade. The UPDV uses 'whore' not to mimic the vocabulary of 1611, but to translate the tone, aggression, and disgust of the ancient Hebrew.

🔗Why the Standard Euphemisms Don't Work

'Fornication': a Latin loanword (fornicatio) that most English speakers cannot define. Webster's 1828 dictionary knew what it meant;6 Collins marks one sense as '(Bible)' usage.7 A word the reader cannot define cannot prohibit anything.

'Sexual immorality': a circular phrase. It defines the sin by calling it immoral. What specific act does it prohibit? The phrase does not specify its content. It is a placeholder where a translation should be.

'Prostitution': a clinical, economic term. When Hosea says Israel has זָנָה (zanah), he is not describing a business transaction. He is describing the betrayal of a marriage. 'Prostitution' strips the covenantal contempt and replaces it with a commercial metaphor that misses the point entirely.

'Lay with': the positional euphemism. Invisible to a modern reader. 'He lay with her' could mean he took a nap beside her. 'He plowed her' cannot be misunderstood.

🔗What the Biblical Authors Actually Said

The Hebrew authors used five distinct words for sexual acts, each naming a different physical reality. English translations collapsed all five into two or three vague words. The UPDV gives each Hebrew word its own English word so the reader can see the distinctions the original author made:

  • 'Had sex with': the baseline. Hebrew: יָדַע (yada', 'to know'). Here the UPDV renders it 'had sex with'; consent comes from the Genesis 4:1 context, not from the lexeme. Genesis 4:1 begins, 'And the man had sex with his wife Eve; and she became pregnant,' before continuing to Cain's birth.
  • 'Plowed': the forceful act. Hebrew: שָׁכַב (shakhav, 'to lie down on'). In sexual uses with the accusative אֵת, it occurs mostly, but not always, in illicit contexts; this is a contextual tendency, not a consent/coercion rule.2 Deuteronomy 22:25: 'the man forces her, and plows her.' Plowing as a sexual metaphor is already in the Bible: at Judges 14:18, Samson says to the Philistines, 'If you⁺ did not plow with my heifer, You⁺ did not find out my riddle.' That verse uses a different Hebrew verb, חָרַשׁ (charash), but the metaphorical domain is the same: agricultural force applied to the body. The UPDV extends this biblical metaphor to שָׁכַב (shakhav) because every positional English alternative ('lay with,' 'slept with,' 'bedded') either lost the gravity or invited evasion.
  • 'Entered': crossing a boundary. Hebrew: בּוֹא אֶל (bo' 'el, 'to go into'). The idiom for a man physically entering a woman. Genesis 16:4: 'And he entered Hagar, and she became pregnant.' The directness is the point: the Hebrew marks the act as a boundary crossing, not a mutual event.
  • 'Stripped naked': sexual exposure by force. Hebrew: גָּלָה עֶרְוָה (galah 'ervah, 'to uncover nakedness'). Used when one person exposes another sexually. Ezekiel 16:37: 'I will strip you naked before them, that they may see all your nakedness.' This is not a wardrobe malfunction. It is a violation.
  • 'Whoring': covenantal betrayal through sex. Hebrew: זָנָה (zanah, 'to whore'). The prophetic word for Israel's spiritual adultery with foreign gods. Hosea 1:2: 'Go, take to yourself a wife of whoring and children of whoring; for the land commits great whoring, [departing] from Yahweh.' This is one strand of vocabulary carried through Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and Revelation.

🔗The Cross-Testament Thread

One significant result of this work is that the prophetic vocabulary remains audible across both testaments.

Revelation's 'the great whore' (17:1) uses the same Greek word family that the Septuagint regularly used for Hebrew זָנָה (zanah). Repeating that family in English keeps the prophetic thread audible.

Now the thread is restored:

  • Judges 2:17: 'they went whoring after other gods'
  • Hosea 1:2: 'a wife of whoring and children of whoring'
  • Hosea 4:12: 'the spirit of whoring has caused them to err'
  • Ezekiel 16:15: 'you whored because of your renown'
  • Jeremiah 3:1: 'you have whored with many companions'
  • Revelation 17:2: 'the kings of the earth went whoring'
  • Revelation 18:3: 'all the nations have drank of the wine of her whoring'

The reader now hears a sustained biblical vocabulary of covenant betrayal running from the Torah through Revelation.

When the speakers say to Jesus 'We are not children of whoring' (John 8:41), the wording permits an echo of Hosea 1:2 ('children of whoring') and 2:4 ('sons of whoring'). The shared vocabulary keeps that possible connection audible.

🔗Why Precision Matters

The UPDV's definitions page defines 'having sex' and 'having any sex' with clinical precision, specifying the contact, the intent involved, and that contact may be direct or indirect and made with a body part or physical object. This definition exists because vague words create loopholes. An eighteen-year-old reading Leviticus 18 needs to understand exactly what is forbidden, not approximately, not euphemistically, exactly. A prohibition against 'fornication' prohibits nothing, no one knows what it means. A prohibition against 'whoring' is unmistakable, and the definition page draws the line the text requires.

Unclear language does not protect anyone. It protects the person who wants to claim they didn't understand what was forbidden.

🔗Translation Theory

The UPDV's approach to sexual language is neither Eugene Nida's Dynamic Equivalence nor Robert Alter's literary preservation. It is register recovery mapped to roots.

The principle: identify the original-language root, determine its register (clinical, vulgar, prophetic, neutral), and find the closest living English word that occupies the same register. Where a Hebrew root and a Greek root share a semantic relationship, as זָנָה (zanah) and πορνεία (porneia) do via the Septuagint, the English should preserve that relationship so the cross-testament echo remains audible. The KJV had this instinct but applied it inconsistently, mixing 'whore,' 'harlot,' and 'fornication' within the same Hebrew word family. The UPDV aims for consistency within each word family, while allowing context to shape the verb form, 'whore' for the person, 'whoring' for the act, 'went whoring' for the prophetic formula.

Kyle Harper's 2012 study shows that classical πορνεία (porneia) was rare but specific, and that Jewish usage widened its range under the influence of זָנָה (zanah).3 The UPDV's rendering preserves that Hebrew–Greek relationship in one English word family.

The UPDV chose clarity over comfort, and precision over propriety. The biblical authors did the same.

🔗Further Reading

1 The KJV uses whor- forms (whore, whoring, whoredom, whoremonger, etc.) extensively across both testaments. The word was standard English, not slang.

2 Hilary Lipka, Sexual Transgression in the Hebrew Bible (Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2006), pp. 187, 207 (n. 32). Lipka records that שָׁכַב (shakhav) + אֵת ('et) is used 'mostly (but not always)' for illicit sex, with counter-examples in the purity regulations (Leviticus 15:18, 24).

3 Kyle Harper, 'Porneia: The Making of a Christian Sexual Norm,' Journal of Biblical Literature 131 (2012): 363–383.

4 Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, rev. ed., NICNT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014), Introduction §I. Fee notes that Aristophanes coined the verb korinthiazō ("to act like a Corinthian, i.e., to commit fornication") because of Corinth's reputation, while cautioning that this aspect "has tended to be overplayed by most NT scholars" and that sexual sin in Paul's Corinth was of the kind expected in any prosperous seaport.

5 The shift from KJV's "whore" to RV's "harlot" is verifiable by comparing the texts. The ERV (1885) retains "whoredoms" as an abstract noun but shifts the personal noun to "harlot" in most places. For the KJV→RV→ASV revision history, see Philip Comfort, The Complete Guide to Bible Versions.

6 Noah Webster, An American Dictionary of the English Language (1828), s.v. "fornication", defines four senses including adultery, incest, and idolatry with biblical cross-references.

7 Collins English Dictionary, 8th ed., s.v. "fornication," sense 3: "Bible: sexual immorality in general, esp adultery."

8 Representative renderings include KJV/AV Genesis 38:15 and Ezekiel 16:35 (harlot), Judges 2:17 (went a whoring), Hosea 1:2 (whoredoms), and 1 Corinthians 5:1 (fornication); ASV Genesis 38:15 (harlot) and Judges 2:17 (played the harlot); RSV Hosea 1:2 (harlotry); NRSV and ESV Hosea 1:2 (whoredom); NRSVue Hosea 1:2 (prostitution); and ESV 1 Corinthians 5:1 (sexual immorality).